When it was disclosed last week that British Airways planned to install non-reclining seats on its 25 new Airbus A320neo and A321neo planes, the predictable outcry ensued.
It was a battle royal between those who favor civility and those who assert their “right” to recline. Among the representative comments on FlyerTalk:
I see the inability to recline seats in short haul a positive! I hate it when the passenger in front reclines.
No recline so stuck bolt upright for 2-3 hours at the end of the work day flying home, no coffee included…
Thank goodness BA have removed recline. No more arguments with the inconsiderate person in front of me now when in Y.
For me, I don’t think a non-reclinable seat for short haul is itself the real issue—up to say 1 hour 30 or so.
And so it will continue, as other airlines follow British Airways in fitting their planes with non-reclining seats. There are those who are categorically opposed to reclining seats, and those who categorically favor them.
Rather than those categorical ayes or nays, however, the best answer might be: It depends. Specifically, it should depend on the legroom between the seats. No one complains when a passenger in first class reclines his or her seat, because there’s plenty or room between seats, and reclining seats won’t encroach on anyone else’s space. But when there are a scant 29 inches between seats, as is increasingly the case in coach cabins, even a fully upright seat back is only a few inches from the face of the passenger behind. Under those circumstances, tilting that seat back even further is inconsiderate of other flyer’s personal space at best, and an act of hostility at worst.
My suggestion as this new reality might spread: For seats with less than, say, 32 inches of pitch (the distance between seats), seats should be fixed in an upright position—no reclining seats. And for seats with 33 or more inches of pitch, seats will be able to recline five degrees for every extra inch of legroom.
There are no absolutes there; recline and pitch are co-variables, as they should be.
Reader Reality Check: Got a better solution? Comment below.
More from SmarterTravel:
- 2017 Was the Safest-Ever Year to Fly
- New Disney Policy Puts Security Over Privacy
- Wallet Watch: The Latest Nasty Fee for Basic Economy Fares
After 20 years working in the travel industry, and 15 years writing about it, Tim Winship knows a thing or two about travel. Follow him on Twitter @twinship.
We hand-pick everything we recommend and select items through testing and reviews. Some products are sent to us free of charge with no incentive to offer a favorable review. We offer our unbiased opinions and do not accept compensation to review products. All items are in stock and prices are accurate at the time of publication. If you buy something through our links, we may earn a commission.