Zero Tarmac Delays in October, but Cancellations Rise

Contributing Editor Carl Unger believes that every trip is worth taking. He loves an extended trip to Europe as much as he enjoys exploring the towns and landscape near home. Basically, you'll find him wherever there is good food, fresh air, and plenty of stories to bring home.

Carl has been writing for SmarterTravel since 2005. His travel writing has also appeared on USA Today and the About.com Boston travel guide.

The Handy Item I Always Pack: "It's not revolutionary, but a small Moleskine notebook is my one travel must-have. It's great for noting things you want to remember and it takes up hardly any space in your bag."

Ultimate Bucket List Experience: "Japan. I'd love to take a month off and visit the cities, temples, and countryside. I'm fascinated by the country's juxtaposition of ancient traditions and modern ambitions."

Travel Motto: “Why do you go away? So that you can come back. So that you can see the place you came from with new eyes and extra colors. And the people there see you differently, too. Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving.” –Terry Pratchett

Aisle, Window, or Middle Seat: "Window."

See recent posts by Carl Unger

Want to receive stories like this every day? Subscribe to our free Deal Alert newsletter.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) finally has the ultimate feather in its cap: a zero-tarmac-delay month. Yes, there were zero tarmac delays longer than three hours in the month of October. That’s the good news. The bad news? Cancellations took a sizable leap in the wrong direction.

First, the positive. “October was the first month that there were no tarmac delays lasting longer than three hours since our rule was adopted,” DOT Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement. “We appreciate the effort that the airlines are putting into making this new rule work effectively for the benefit of their passengers.” The DOT’s new rule has all but eliminated tarmac delays since it took effect in late April, but now the agency can say, for one month at least, that tarmac delays were completely eliminated.

But the difference between four tarmac delays in September and zero in October is mostly symbolic. The difference between 4,654 canceled flights in September and 5,275 in October is a bit more meaningful. That’s 600 more cancellations than September, likely affecting several thousand travelers.

But while a month-over-month spike isn’t what the DOT wants to see, the big-picture numbers paint a more optimistic picture. Here are the monthly cancellation numbers since the rule took effect:

May: 6,716 – 1.2 percent of flights
June: 8,279 – 1.5 percent
July: 8,170 – 1.4 percent
August: 5,613 – 1.0 percent
September: 4,754 – 0.90 percent
October 5,275 – 0.97 percent

Six months in with the new rules, a trend seems to be emerging: Three rough months followed by three better months. This suggests the airlines might be catching on, but weather likely played a role, here, too. Airlines don’t specify if and when weather causes cancellations, but they do for delays. In October, 0.31 percent of flights were delayed by “extreme weather,” while in July, that figure was 0.79 percent. In raw numbers, that’s a difference of almost 3,000 flights. It’s fair to assume weather had a similar effect on cancellations, too.

Which means the next few months will be particularly telling. Can airlines manage the new rule as winter takes hold?

We hand-pick everything we recommend and select items through testing and reviews. Some products are sent to us free of charge with no incentive to offer a favorable review. We offer our unbiased opinions and do not accept compensation to review products. All items are in stock and prices are accurate at the time of publication. If you buy something through our links, we may earn a commission.