American to charge for all checked bags

Archived Comments:

• travelfreak - May 31, 2008

  Sorry folks! Look at the fuel prices and tell me how the airlines are expected to stay in business with the fares so cheap! No airline will take the step to raise the fares where they need to be. So, we will all pay the extras till it hurts. Airfares have been inexpensive for a long time. There won't be any airlines if they don't do something. So, pay the extras or pay higher fares. What choice do we have?

• achevres - May 31, 2008

  To valtuff: Absolutely agree and I have been saying this since the fee for 2nd bag was started. I am, at 120 lbs, in fact, subsidizing the 250+ lb passenger. It is quite discriminatory against the smaller passengers. The weight allowance should be for both passenger and his luggage and both should be weighed together. And, yes, Shaq and any other extremely large person should pay accordingly.

• agentspalko - May 21, 2008

  How soon till they start charging for carry-ons, I wonder? AA better hope other airlines match this, otherwise they'll look even worse. If that's even possible at this point.

• Snomad - May 21, 2008

  Unbelievable! I keep asking when the madness will stop, and the airlines keep answering "never." It's a sad day for travelers everywhere when the airlines charge us to check one simple bag. I predict carry-on luggage is next, and then coats when traveling to cold climates, until finally we'll be charged a fee to carry a wallet aboard. You may laugh, but as the author of this blog stated this goes beyond crying.

• dieuwer - May 21, 2008

  Soon, I will be cheaper to drive from the East to the West coast with a family of four than take the plane!

• Selwynista - May 21, 2008

  I don't know why they don't just raise prices instead of adding a fee here and a fee there. Very irritating. I read an article about more and more passengers arguing over storage space in the planes and it seems moves like this will only make that worse; airlines very rarely stop anyone from carrying oversize bags on flights now (that I've seen), now there will be more of them. They feel they've got us because flight is the only way to travel over several states quickly. What's your other option? Well, mine is to stop traveling. I'm cancelling my annual holiday trip, and next year I may not take any flights at all.

• The Big Woof! - May 21, 2008

  American and all other Airlines should seriously reconsider this decision. Other ways of making up the revenue, even price increases, make much more sense. The worst consequence in this policy will be that more people will stop checking luggage and try to carry on more, thus overstuffing already overfull bins on the planes, as well as slowing down and causing longer lines at security checks. As a result, the Airlines will have to enforce size and number limits on carry-ons more thoroughly which will result in angry passenger reactions or worse as well as other problems: if a carry on is deemed too large, will they demand it be checked at the gate, and if so, how are they going to attempt to charge people for this procedure? I foresee many serious problems resulting from a very narrow minded poorly thought out decision.

• valtuff - May 21, 2008

  The airlines could institute a much fairer procedure if their objective is to cut down weight carried and/or make passengers pay for the additional weight. Passengers should pay according to how much weight they and their luggage weigh together. For example, I weigh 125 lbs. and my luggage of two separate pieces (so that I can manage carrying them) weigh less than 50 lbs. That means I would pay for 175 lbs. in total. It angers me when a person weighing 300 lbs. can bring on two bags at 50 lbs. each, making 400 lbs. total flying weight, and pays the same price that I do. Do the math----400-175 = 225 lbs. more than me, more than twice what I have for flying weight. Why am I paying for these persons? (If this does nothing else, it might encourage some to lose weight.) I am happy to pay for MY part, and my part doesn't consume as much fuel.

• ichibanjohn - May 21, 2008

  They should get rid of all those stupid magazines,that would save about 1000 pounds. When we fly I take all of them from our seats and put them in an overhead far away. I have never seen anybody that duty free crap, that would save about 1000 pounds.

• bsm - May 21, 2008

  Isn't this essentially discriminatory against family and recreational travelers. Families, especially those with younger children, often need to bring substantial additional luggage (car seats, strollers, etc.). Do the airlines really believe that it's a smart idea to make yourself out to be a family-unfriendly industry? Oil prices go up so we punish people for having, and wanting to fly with, their children. And the kicker is that somebody in management actually thought this sounded like a good idea.

• sammy - May 21, 2008

  I cannot wait to sit back and watch this backfire on American. No wonder all the other majors are just waiting to see what happens. This is pushing the line too far and consumers are sure to let them have it. Good luck American!

• Carl Unger, SmarterTravel.com - May 22, 2008

  You know, before yesterday I would have laughed at the suggestion that airlines might begin charging for carry-on luggage. However, if American's new fee shows us anything, it's that the airlines are desperate for new revenue sources, so much that they'll charge for 'sacred' complimentary services such as checked baggage. My guess is that the industry will test American's policy, and at least a few airlines will add similar fees. Once that happens, though, it's quite possible that fuel prices will force carriers to begin looking for new revenue sources again, and carry-on bags could very well be seen as an option.

• luvs to travel - May 22, 2008

  to "valstuff" .. You've got to be kidding!! you mean someone like Shaq O'Neill would be grounded??Please get real.

• Iris - May 22, 2008

  Honestly, this is getting out of control. In my case, I've been checking in my luggage, even for short business trips since TSA began restricting liquids on planes. This coupled with American charging for all checked lugagges simply inconvenience me as a traveler... But then again, customer service has been continuously getting worst over time. And the airlines get away with it, because in many instance, people are left with no options but to travel.

• JA - May 22, 2008

  It's not entirely correct when you state "Delta will pass"...all they said is that they are weighing their options. They will all follow like sheep, because not following AA will not do them any good. The additional revenue is too hard to pass up.

• km - May 22, 2008

  Since they have added this new fee, I hope they have updated their web site to allow for paying up front for checking a bag. The lines at the airport are already long without having to fork over cash or a credit card. I think they should have imbedded the increase in their fares, but since this is their decision, my decision will be to fly another airline. Note: it looks like their limit for a carry-on is 45 linear inches (H+W+L), personal item 36 linear inches. Time to pack a measureing tape.

• Carey in Dallas - May 22, 2008

  I have over one million miles on American Airlines, but this policy has driven me to make them my carrier of last resort. it doesn't feel good to me that passengers are being incented to carry on luggage. Very soon we will be right back to the unacceptable "on time" ratings because boarding will become such a problem. Can you tell me how passengers can demand that the executives at corporate stop giving themselves reprehensible bonuses and start treating passengers and employees with a little respect?

• mkp - May 22, 2008

  Its absolutely unbelievable. We cant take carry ons because of regulations for sizes/amounts of shampoo and other products, yet now, because we have to follow those rules, we have to pay for it. People can barely afford anything these days, and they want to nickel and dime. This is complete BS, American should be ashamed of themselves. There is no way that you can look your customers in the eye, the same customers that stood by the airline after 9/11, and justify this fee. What a disgrace.

• kk - May 22, 2008

  I can't wait to see how the flight attendants plan to get all the carry on luggage in the overhead bins. And then when they are full how they determine who has to pay to check their luggage - those that board in GROUP 6. Let the CHAOS begin!

• Sad - May 22, 2008

  I have been boycotting the air lines for several years now.I think we are treated like a heard of cattle.I believe we have allowed all companys to make to much proffit.Causing our econnomy to fail.I feel that those who have protiffet in hugh amounts should give back and ease the economy before it all fails.

• Amanda - May 22, 2008

  Similar to " Valtuff" - 5/21/08) I think those who add unusual weight (way beyond their healthy body weight) should pay for that extra. If our weight and luggage was combined, including carry-ons, it would more fairly distribute the cost. If there was a bottom line price wise, everyone would know ahead of time and there would be no surprise. Everyone has choices, including traveling with your kids. If that is your choice then you should take responsibility for paying your fair share.

• lynn merrill - May 22, 2008

  I think it is absurd! Wait till you see the security lines! All those bags, normally checked being dragged on the plane, probably only to be put back to baggage (for free?) because there is no room in the bins.....meantime it holds up the security line, the plane's departure time etc. WE WILL ALL SUFFER FROM THIS ONE....we don't even have to fly American.........That should be the goal. I don't think the airport security should allow it, or at least charge American the extra checkers they will need.

• no more American - May 22, 2008

  I WILL NOT fly American or any other airline that charges me to check one bag! I'll drive or not make the trip.

• foxy lady - May 22, 2008

  AA is now one of the highest priced airline. I have used them for more than 25 years until now. With the high price and baggage charge, my loyalty is best suited to another carrier. They do not offer "match" pricing, meals, snacks,which should be part of the ticket price now this baggage cost, no thanks AA, some other airline will appreciate my bussiness better.

• BHo - May 22, 2008

  I personally think this move is outrageous and can't wait to see the CEO fired for agreeing to this. I think they would have been better off just building this baggage fee into the ticket price. In addition, now passengers will just start traveling with the biggest luggage they have possible which will ultimately not reduce any weight on the plane at all. I personally vow not to fly with AA anymore due to this.

• john adams - May 22, 2008

  SouthWest airlines uses jet fuel,however, their management hedged the cost by being competent. This move by American just underlines the inept and incompetent management which drives them. Aside from the poor managemnet factor. What is so difficult regarding a decision inform the public that higher fuel costs will require an increase in ticket costs? In all probability, no matter which way the fuel costs go, the charge for luggage will be permanent. A rather neat way to gain extra revenue,....if your part of the mediocre management team which comprises American!

• timberlinebob - May 22, 2008

  Its no late news flash that all the airlines in the past have had trouble staying out of the red, so it doesn't surprize me that AA will charge for the first bag as well as the second. The thing that bothers me most are the inconsiderate passengers boarding ahead of you and holding up the whole line to get their bag in the overhead. I think that instead of charging for the first bag, they should put that fee on carry-on's instead. Think how fast you would be able to board and also deplane?

• JJ - May 22, 2008

  Here's an idea -- wear all of your clothes -- that's right, put on 7 pairs of underwear -- and then you won't have any luggage. Buy your toiletries at the other end of your trip. Stuff your medications into the pockets of your clothes. Just hope they don't shut down the air conditioning!

• frequentflier - May 22, 2008

  Since the airlines have instituted this baggage fee, I now travel with 1 bag at 50 pounds. I'm a petite person and prefer to travel with 2 smaller bags since they are easier to handle, etc. However, we're now forced to cram everything into one checked bag rather than spreading the weight out into multiple smaller bags. Have the airlines considered the impact on the health of their baggage handlers and employees with handling heavier bags rather than multiple smaller bags? Their workman comps and health insurance claims are going to skyrocket!

• jumpdogjump - May 22, 2008

  Seems to me since this was announced at the annual meeting that this has as much to do with saving the CEO's job by appearing to be proactive, what with massive protests being held outside the hall and unprecedented security on hand to keep unwanted people out. I seriousle doubt Arpey et. al. expected this to be the lead story on the 6 o'clock news.

• Former flyer now an RV'er - May 22, 2008

  Husband & I just retired & decided RV'ng would now be cheaper, even with the price of gas, then to fly. We now are saving on hotel & meals, of course we now have all the time needed to drive. I feel for the people that need to fly especially if they travel with family, and yes that's there choice , but why penalize them just because they are family oriented. Hopefully other airlines don't follow with this ridiculous extra chgs. Mngmnt should take a cut in pay

• Newark Frequent Flyer - May 22, 2008

  When will we get tired of airlines charging us for their policy of big bonuses to exec's and overpaying their pilots (senior captains on wide bodies earn up to 200k/per year)? Sure higher fuel prices effect the industry but not as much as poor service (leading to less flying) and over-paid executives and pilots! Cut there first, not the source of your revenue.

• furious - May 22, 2008

  If the airlines are going to chatge for baggage then they should charge everyone It seems if you are a person that can afford to travel 1st class then your luggage flies for free once again everything seems to benefit the well to do

• amsogrumpy - May 22, 2008

  I SO agree with everything everyone said. It's absolutely ridiculous. Where's the logic in this decision?Can you imagine the time it'll take to put all the carry on luggage in the overhead bins? Can you imagine the anger from persons whose average size carry on is smashed by the late comer with the large/heavy bag that's crammed on top of theirs? It's beyond comprehension that this policy will fly! (Sorry for the bad pun.)

• Make My Day - May 22, 2008

  I think we ought to fight back and not travel, stay home and let them loose the buisness. Won't hurt me to stay home. Seems the consumer has to pay the price do we get raises No!!. Go back to horse back and buggie days. It would be cheaper to feed and water a horse. If it isn't one thing it will be another. What is next? No one will eventually travel and then they will get what they deserve no consumers.

• FloridaFlyers - May 22, 2008

  We fly frequently on Spirit, and do not mind at all the extra charges for extra services. When we do not check any bags, we consider it a discount! We will take low fares over the extras everytime.

• Frequent Flier2 - May 22, 2008

  So, will this new fee guarantee that my checked luggage won't be lost?

• bbarker - May 22, 2008

  People need to get real - it's not an inalienable human right to fly for "cheap." The extra fees right now reflect marketplace. Didn't any of you ever take an economics class? You don't have to like it to at least understand what's happening.

• traveler2 - May 22, 2008

  This gives me still another reason not to fly American. Although I also have air miles accumulated with AA, I would rather lose them than fly American if I can possibly help it. It just seems that this kind of nickel and diming will help AA to go under. Besides angering customers, this will increase the competition for overhead space, and the nastiness that contaminates the flying atmosphere between customers, and that between customers and flight attendant. All in all it makes driving or sailing a much more attractive idea.

• vp - May 22, 2008

  this will just add another criteria for looking at airline prices on line & believe me the last airline that charges you for baggage will be the winner

• rottmom - May 22, 2008

  I have been loyal to AA for over 20 years but I'm cashing in my miles and going elsewhere. Maybe all the airlines are getting dismal but enough is enough - no pillows, very few dirty blankets for all of economy class, no food except the overpriced garbage they sell on board, seat rows so close together I had bruises on my knees after my recent trip to Amsterdam, rude attendants, unsafe grounded planes. I'm fed up. I love to travel and take 4 trips a year but it is becoming such an ordeal, I've lost my enthusiasm and dread enduring the flights. I try to upgrade to business class using miles and they have a mysterious pecking order for getting those seats and you never get off the wail list even when you book 5-6 months in advance and travel in low season. I have NOTHING good to say about AA. They deserve to go bankrupt.

• sera - May 22, 2008

  How far are we away from a 'one complimentary trip to the restroom' policy? Sheesh.

• VTraveler - May 22, 2008

  I want an airline to come out and say: here is what it costs to fly this route, add to it your share of the overhead, and this is what the final ticket price is. How much sense would that make? The airlines would be getting enough revenues from actual ticket sales to not nickel and dime travelers. It makes no sense that it costs me $297 to fly from Santa Barbara to New York but $800+ to fly Santa Barbara to San Francisco. Make the fares equal the flights! Dumbest people anywhere have to be airline executives.

• irish56e8 - May 22, 2008

  To Timberlinebob---Great stuff my man! There is nothing, NOTHING more annoying than some anal retentive person literally stuffing a carry-on that's visibly over the size limits into the overhead compartment! You are right dead on--charging these primma donnas for carry-on baggage would definitely speed up the boarding and deplaning times...

• jjFlier - May 22, 2008

  My hope is that the newer, lower cost carriers (like JetBlue and airTran) will refrain from charging for baggage and eventually increase their market share. But, AA may actually reduce their fare slightly and capture the revenue with the pay per bag charge. Regardless, the traveling public will take another hit. Maybe there should simply be a surcharge based on the cost of Jet A fuel and the distance traveled. Alas.......

• F - May 22, 2008

  I would rather know up front how much something was going to cost than have to try and figure out how much more all the "hidden" fees are going to make it really cost. People are going to figure out that $200 fare they thought they paid for actually cost them a great deal more. I think this is very disingenuous and dishonest of the airlines. If it's going to cost more, it's going to cost more; if that means fewer of us will be flying, then fewer of us will be flying. Some of us can figure out that 39 and 9/10th of a cent is really 40 cents. So just charge us 40 cents. Others have already commented on the issue of TSA restrictions and checking luggage.

• SarahP - May 22, 2008

  If this is to become standard in the industry, then the TSA should seriously consider rescinding the 3-ounce liquid and gels requirement in carry-ons. One shouldn't be forced to choose between paying to check a bag or not having enough toiletries for a vacation with the carry-on limits. Enough is enough!

• bingonurse - May 22, 2008

  So, I bought/paid for my AA ticket for travel on 6/3 on 4/18-- hopefully, the new rules won't apply to me for this trip. I'm waiting for an official reply to my fax- since "they" won't talk in person to a customer anymore. What about the plan that we were reading about- flying slower, and saving fuel?? and adding 10 minutes to the trip?

• Ceil - May 22, 2008

  These piecemeal prices mindboggle many. I'd rather have one higher price than to know it's X for airfare and Y for luggage. The overheads bins are going to be really precious to everyone flying AA. Let's hope the other airlines DO NOT follow suit, because they stand to gain customers as a result of AA's mistake.

• AncientAdmiral - May 22, 2008

  We're booked on AA in mid-September. The AA Contract for Carriage in effect at the time of the ticket purchase allows for one free bag per Pax. What are the chances of enforcing the pre-announcement CoC after june 15th? Does anybody have an ancedote about the similiar situation with the two-bag rule?

• Paul - May 22, 2008

  I think ot would be more reasonable to charge a fee for carry on luggage. As it is now people are carryng on larger suitcases to fit in the overhead and that just causes more confusion in the cabin causing delays.

• waynecris - May 22, 2008

  My husband has flown AA for business purposes for the past 30 years. We as a family (and now as a couple) always prefer to fly AA due to schedules and convenience. This has been about the last straw. We already had two trips booked for June and September. Does that mean that we get by "for free" on these trips? When you are gone a week or more, you cannot possible cram everything into carry-ons! And when you are Senior Citizens, you can't handle a 50 pound bag either! I know we don't fly quite as often as when we were working, but we normally fly at least 5 or 6 times a year -- or did so in the past. Now, Amtrack is starting to look pretty darned good!

• Takoma Park - May 22, 2008

  The last time I flew American (from Chicago to DC), the agents did not preboard two elderly ladies in wheelchairs and a blind man with a seeing-eye dog (one wonders what special needs one would have to have to be eligible for preboarding). After the masters of the universe got to board the rest of us in steerage basically stepped over the blind gentleman who was stuck in the aisle with his dog and around the ladies in the wheelchairs who were parked most ungratiously with the strollers and the car seats. It was way beyond crass -- not to mention incredibly inefficient. So, in short, I am not surprised at their new policy to charge for any checked bags and expect it to only increase the pain of boarding. I have not flown American since -- they are the absolute last choice for me and the people for whom I work.

• Kerstin - May 22, 2008

  Well, this simply means that everyone will now try to get the biggest bag possible into the plane and the overhead bins will run out of space even sooner. So, passengers getting on board later who can't find space in the bins have to check in with the flight attendants - which causes delays and aggrevation for everyone involved. And yes, what's with the liquid ban from TSA? If I can't bring my shampoo etc on board, and have to pay $15 to get the bag checked - how hairbrained is that now? Good thing I have a choice - I am simply not flying AA any longer, but will support Delta (as long as they stick to their promise of not charging for check-in luggage). Hmmm, what was that with the "friendly skies" again?

• sugar15cat - May 22, 2008

  Airfares are sky high; you have to pay for food on board; and now you have to pay to check your bags. The middle class traveler continues to bear the brunt of all these increases, yet first class, elite and business class get all the perks. If they can afford those astronomical airfares, they can pay their share for checked bags. What will happen next is that flights will be bombarded with carry on bags as passengers will bring them on board in order to avoid these charges. AA should just make all their flights first class, elite and business class. It seems that is who they cater to anyway. I was a loyal customer to American Airlines, but with this new low they've hit , they have lost my business for good.

• optinyc - May 22, 2008

  I agree with a couple of you that American should just raise their fares, which every airline will have to do eventually. I believe what's going through the minds of execs at AA is that the general flying public always looks at the cheapest fares, and even a raise in their base price will cause John Q Public to purchase tickets on other carriers. Of course, charging for the first checked bag is pretty ridiculous, and there's a good chance they will have to rescind this decision on the grounds of providing better customer service since it will drive customers to another carrier. I feel people who prefer to fly on AA would rather be told that fares are going up due to fuel costs rather than paying for checked luggage and being given the same reason. The two don't really correlate. As for getting rid of the on-board magazines, I think that's a brilliant idea. I'm sure the cost savings are rather minimal, but I don't see many people bothering with it. It's really only worthwhile to promote AA's partnerships and destinations anyway.

• ctssy - May 22, 2008

  It's getting ridiculous. Long lines, frustrating people who wait til the beginning of the security check station to start getting computer out, taking out quart bag, endless waiting for ill prepared people, then the ultimate insult, the airlines decide to do something totally idiotic. Who can bear it? We're not gonna take it anymore!!!

• Bluevoter - May 22, 2008

  I've given up on American, now that they are only the 5th best airline (out of 5) flying between SFO and JFK. I've flown RyanAir and other airlines that charge for checked baggage, so I can't say that it's a surprise that a major US airline has joined the party. I hope that someone with a video camera records the onboard scene when someone with half of their life's possessions is unable to cram their carry-on into an overhead compartment, and has a meltdown when he or she is told to gate check the bag and pay $15. That will be the most watched YouTube video for a long time. American was very stupid in the way they announced this charge. They made it sound as if it was about the cost of flying additional weight. If that were the case, then they would weigh us all with our bags at checkin and have us pay according to the total. That would cause everyone to flip out. They should instead have had the sense to say that it costs money to handle (more accurately, mishandle) your bags, considering all of the people involved. So those needing baggage service should have to pay for it while everyone else avoids a price increase for now.

• GRANDMA - May 22, 2008

  THEY ARE CRAZY. SURE SCREW THE CONSUMER WHY NOT . I SURE HOPE THAT THEY LOOSE BUSINESS FOR THEIR GREEDINESS. THE SKUNKS. THAT IS ALL PART OF TRAVELING. WHAT, ARE THEY GOING TO CHARGE FOR USING THE BATHROOM NEXT?

• terence from ny - May 22, 2008

  its very simple people. just fly someone else...i will not pay for a checked bag nor will i pay for a window or aisle seat....enough is enough........boycott american people.....plain and simple

• condo king - May 22, 2008

  The airlines need to stop "nickel & diming" us. Just raise the dam fares to what it takes to make some money. My wife is a travel agent that sells cruises. She is very busy and the all inclusive cruises are selling well. Charging for checked bags is one of the dumbest things I ever heard of!!!

• morgan - May 22, 2008

  OMG valtuff. Talk about discrimination based on weight. Honey, I may be fat, but I bet you're ugly, and I can go on a diet!

• diplo - May 22, 2008

  A day may come when the airlines will install Credit Card machine on the bathroom doors! Or, better, they might sell their own special card at the counter just to make money on the needy passengers! Run for the bathrooms before departure!

• se - May 22, 2008

  Does this new fee for the first bag include a guarantee that you will get it when you reach your destination? I checked a bag once on a AA direct non stop flight and they lost my luggage. I was po'd. I can't image what kind of h_ll I probably would have raised if I had to pay for the privilege of them loosing my luggage. I suppose now I will be happy to sit in that fowl seat next to the restroom. At least then I know I will have a space to put in my carry on since I will be boarded first. Good luck and God bless people seated in rows 15 forward because by the time they get in, there will not be any overhead space left. As it is the flight attendants stand by idly while one person packs in 2 bags, the computer and the heavy coat while leaving a nice big space under their seat. Will they hold your bag hostage if you are forced to check your carry on and refuse to pay?

• Absurdity - May 22, 2008

  What's next - pay toilets? I'm waiting for them to announce that they're charging for sodas and carry ons. I'll definitely be looking to fly a different airline. The security lines at American are going to be nothing short of a nightmare when people start carrying on all of their luggage. Not to mention significant slowdowns in boarding time as everyone tries to stow their luggage in the overhead bins. And what about the planes they contract with that don't have adequate overhead storage to fit even overnight bags (ie. Chautauqua Airlines that flies as American)? It doesn't seem fair to charge for checked baggage when you don't have a choice to carry it on.

• sugar15cat - May 22, 2008

  And the biggest hit below the belt...if they lose your bags, the checked bag fee will not be refunded.

• schulo310 - May 22, 2008

  I just made frequent flyer award reservations to go to NY from LA. I had a choice of Delta or AA. I chose Delta and got my award flight. Thank goodness! I will never travel on AA again!!!!

• familyof5 - May 22, 2008

  holy cow!!!!! I can't believe this. I live on the west coast and practically every year take my family to Florida, three children included. With everything going up, we've really had to save, this may very well end our tradition, if the other airlines follow. If they don't, AA will probably go out of business. I don't know many people in their right mind who would choose to pay for checked bags when another airline doesn't charge. I'm with bsm (5/21) this is a huge blow to anyone with a family, especially small children. I add myself to those that have said they WILL NOT FLY WITH ANY AIRLINE WHO CHARGES US TO BRING LUGGAGE!!

• High Milage Flyer - May 22, 2008

  This is a poorly thought out new policy. I frequently fly through Baltimore and cannot imagine what this will do to the already slow security screening times. But more importantly, its a matter of safety. Overstuffed cabins make evacuation hard in the event of an emergency. The Federal Government should step in and require every airline to take on checked bag up to X weight free on every flight and in exchange for this radically limit the size and weight of carry-on bags. (And if they want to make flyers happy, also enact a baggage handling standard).

• DICKBYRNE - May 22, 2008

  THEY WANT THE CARGO TO GO, NOT YOUR LUGGAGE. THAT IS WHY THEY HOLD UP THE LUGGAGE FOR AN HOUR AFTER A FLIGHT.

• s.arena - May 22, 2008

  Hopefully everyone will eventually get a clue and realize that businesses are entitled to make a profit, or at least break even. What other alternative is there but to try and collect additional money to try and cover the doubling of the fuel prices over the past year.The airlines are all on the verge of extinction while the oil companies rake in record billions in oil profits. If you want to fly be prepared to, at the very least, pay for what it costs to transport you and your belongings. Airline rates and fees have never increased at the same rates as the cost of living or the cost of anything else, for that matter. We have been spoiled for too long.

• JJMiami - May 22, 2008

  Lots of good comments that point out the limitations charging for checked bags will pose to the flying public. The cruise lines have just added fuel surcharges to each ticket. That makes more sense then charging for luggage that will delay security check in lines and boarding times as well as lead to overstuffed overhead bins. One thing the current fuel crisis points out is the need for an alternative energy policy in the US. The only way to ensure the survival of the airline and auto industries in the US is with cheaper, alternative fuels and I do not mean corn based ethanol that leads to higher food prices.

• jaysee - May 22, 2008

  Commercial flights are going back to the days when only the wealthy could afford air travel. I find myself resuming vacation searches close to home like my wife and I did when we were newlyweds.

• nysavvytraveler - May 22, 2008

  This is rediculous! I will not fly AA anymore. I sincerely hope the other airlines don't follow suit. Every airline should allow at least one checked bag. Every other mode of transportation allows free baggage. Why do airlines think they are any different?

• dulcinea - May 22, 2008

  Valtuf--- What an unkind, self-centered way to try to solve an already difficult situation! Even if you think the airlines should charge for baggage according to weight of person plus bags, you didn't have to make the rude, childish remarks about people who are larger than you. Some people have medical problems that cause them to be large, and yes, some of it is genetic. Let's find a better way to solve this problem other than by obvious desire for discrimination and personal bigotry. Let's see, why don't the airlines ban passengers under 150 lbs so the rest of us can fly comfortably? It makes as much sense as what you suggested.

• buffrunner - May 22, 2008

  Flying is just not fun anymore. I have always loved to fly, but I might consider boycotting flying in favor of going places to which I can drive. Even the gas and related expenses would wind up being cheaper than flying!

• mzpoli - May 22, 2008

  So after the increase everything when will they decrease the fare's and give passangers better service.NEVER I just booked American airlines for a family vacation and I had just found out about this ridiculous charges I really which I can change my flight to a diffrenet airlines. If not for the travelers who would pay their salary's mand keep the airlines up and running I hope they really know what they are doing. Buy the way I have booked my tickets for one price and then was notified of an increase of $50.00 for fuel charge and know this. This will be my last trip flying that is for sure, and I usually travel with aprox 25 people a couple times a year. So good bye to American Airlines For Sure!!!!

• weary traveler - May 22, 2008

  I will do all possible to avoid AA. None of the airlines are good but this has just crossed the line. I work for a travel company and will do all possible to have my clients contract with anyone other than AA. United is looking better and better - hope AA loses a huge market share to them.

• calijim - May 22, 2008

  As an AA stockholder and frequent flyer, I am split whether to like this or not. But, as an Executive Platinum, I am sure glad that I can use the First Class security lines (as if they weren't bad enough already) and get on board first. I have seen what is already allowed onboard as carry-ons and I am sure glad that I will get on first and place my baggage before the person carrying 5 things looking for overhead space. Get to my status (>100k per year) and that should give you the right to have some perks! I'll be reading my paper and drinking champagne while the others are fighting over space

• suesabelle - May 22, 2008

  I purchased roundtrip ticket on Delta before the $25 increase for 2nd checked bag went into affect. I will be starting my trip on July 1. After reading yesterday the article on the ruling that airlines cannot add on fees after ticket is purchased I am assuming that I can check 2 bags for free. Please run an article concerning this point.

• Leon Bleiberg - May 22, 2008

  It stinks! This is just another reason why we are headed for the greatest 'stagflatlion ever!! Put the airline executive in the same pot with the oil company executives, etc.

• Hi Traveler - May 22, 2008

  I think the airlines are just going to put themselves out of business very slowly. People are not going to do that much traveling. With the prices going up on everything. Even business travel to cut down. What is this world coming to!!!!

• BIGAAGE - May 22, 2008

  I CAN'T BELIEVE WANTS GOING ON FIRST THEY CHARGE TO CHECK THE BAGS TWO DOLLARS A BAG . THEY TOOK THE PILLOWS AWAY THE SNACKS AWAY AND, NOW THEY ARE CHARGING FOR BAGAGE THEY MUST BE KIDDING ME. I'M GOING TO STOP FLYING AMERICAN AND, I HAVE LOTS OF MILES BUT, I DON'T WANT TO KNOW FROM THEM ANY MORE AND, I HOPE THAT EVERYONE GETS SMART AND, STOPS FLYING THEM I DON'T CARE IF THEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS. I AGREE STOP NICKELING AND DIMING EVERYONE AND, ADD IT TO THE PRICE OF THE TICKET.

• frequent traveler - May 22, 2008

  I believe American and the other airlines are missing a great revenue opportunity with their captive audience: Pay Toilets. Side benefit: an increase in sales of Depends.

• bhjean - May 22, 2008

  Don't know how much it would cost but if time permitted maybe the best thing would be to send luggage ahead via DHL, FEDEX or USPS. One case and a carry-on would already be $40.00. This way luggage would be delivered and waiting at your destination.

• John - May 22, 2008

  Valtuff & Amanda people like you make me sick . always the high and mighty probaley never had a family and want to run people down , sorry we cant all be skinny whimps and we pay our share just like you do

• garden gal - May 22, 2008

  has anybody tried sending luggage ahead by ups or fedex does this work? is it any cheaper

• mut - May 22, 2008

  The answer is simple: Boycott AA for sneaking into the back door to raise air fares; blaming jet fuel; give me a break!!!!! Another tactic to nickel and dime us; SHAMELESS!!!!!!!!

• secretagentgirl - May 22, 2008

  If they are now charging for our luggage $15 for one and so on , does that mean there is no weight requirement now . So I can check one bag for $15.00 and it can weigh anywhere from 1 to 100 lbs. . Why pay for 2 bags when you can pay just $15.00 for one very very large bag .

• DianneL - May 22, 2008

  The passengers will drag their bags to the airplane and find that the passengers already on board have already taken all the carry-on space, so money and time will be lost boarding since AA handlers will have to take the luggage by hand and stow underneath the plane. No revenue, just wasted time. I certainly feel for the flight attendants that have to deal with this mess. I believe that the executives of AA need to give up their high bonuses and put the money into the AA revenues and salaries for the flight attendants. I believe AA is going to lose patronage by charging for the first bag. I have over 1.5 million miles but am re-thinking my airline choices in the future.

• ufolksrnutz - May 22, 2008

  The flying public has to get real. I don't know what business you are in, but I'm in the airline biz. You can't fly people for cheap and stay in business. Much of our economy is depending on air travel's survival. The average domestic coupon (one flight leg) fare is $149. The average cost to fly that segment (per passenger) is $169. Do the math...something has to give. Is this the right way? Don't know....but why should the guy who going for a "day trip" or a quick overnighter and has a small carry-on pay the same as the person who brings a carry-on, a personal item (a large purse or briefcase usually) and then checks 2 large (50 lb) bags? Yes, this pricing (along with other charges) smacks of "McDonald's" airlines, but really....isn't that what you people are asking for? Pay up or .... up.

• Former AA Frequent Flyer - May 22, 2008

  As my screen name implies, I will no longer look at AA when another carrier serves my destination. In quest of a bottom line, AA is willing to not weather the fuel storm with the rest of us. Be vigilant for AA's next step--charging passengers by how much THEY weigh!

• chiwinelady - May 22, 2008

  This is going to make carry on usage even worse. Business travelers depend on the ability to use carryons. As inexperienced travelers start carrying on more will delay flights even more.

• retired - May 22, 2008

  I think they have to do something to stay in business. I will pay without complaint or stay at home.

• Henry - May 22, 2008

  It never ceases to amaze me how the airline CEO's start crying when their fuel costs go up(last figure that was published was$3.00/gal.)Big deal, today I bought gasoline for my car and paid $4.20/gal.How can I complain and to whom, maybe I should charge the station operator for me buying gas from him. I do NOT make a HIGH six figure or higher salary and my solution to this is very simple:instead of having ten planes leave to the same destination at 15 minute intervals, cut the number of flights by 60% and get rid of the obsolete MD80s that you take out of service and see what happens.Your so called flying public will just have to change the attitude " I want it and I want it now" and learn to plan their travels around the fewer number of flights.I did that in my driving and it works.We will just have to forego our "instant gratification" attitude.

• Vacationer - May 22, 2008

  What about traveling on a code-sharing flight, for example connecting to Alaska Air via American Eagle? Just wondering. We already have our tickets.

• OtherChoices - May 22, 2008

  Fortunately, at this point we have other choices for airlines-at least travel from where I live. Even if American changes their mind and allows free luggage, I wouldn't use their company. NEVER will I fly on American Airlines.

• marcusmembrane - May 22, 2008

  I won't ever fly American again, at least not on my own dime. Regarding the comment of the 125 pounder, who's hopefully a woman or a jockey, I think there needs to be something other than sheer weight for a penalty to kick in. I'm 6'4" and 250, and while my shoulders sometimes encroach from my favorite aisle seat to a middle seat passenger, it's usually my knees that punch into the back rest of the seat in front of me. This is far-fetched (but so was an airline charging for a single checked bag), but maybe the carriers could set up some kind of measuring device, so that if you're a certain width out of proportion to your height, they'd charge you for flying all that extra flab. Shaq, at 7' tall, would make it through, but not those porkers whose flesh drapes over the seat arms and into the aisles. Yep, I'm pissed at the hopelessly obese, and American Airlines.

• Fjgbueyes - May 22, 2008

  I feel AA will loose alot business to Jet Blue.

• jan - May 22, 2008

  now i can't travel because i have five kids and one with wheelchair. NO CLOTHES , No family TRIP! IMAGINE PAYING FOR LUGGAGE !FOR 7 PEOPLE. ITSA INSANE! VACATION MONEY WOULD BE WASTED ON LUGGAGE.

• quiltlady - May 23, 2008

  I've read all the comments and only saw one that referred to the elderly and those with physical disabilities. I'm over 70, on a fixed income, have children on the west and east coast, and we live in the middle of the country. It's necessary for me to check a bag as I have advanced rheumatoid arthritis and can't lift a bag into the overhead. My visits are typically 7 to 10 days long and I can't imagine how I can continue to fly to see them and it breaks my heart. As one blogger said "Amtrack is looking better an better."

• Coach B - May 23, 2008

  Boycotting AA is a great idea but we must ALL let them know we are boycotting them through e-mails, letters and calls. Also for this action to be more influencial, we should let the other airlines know our position through e-mails, letters and calls while they are "studying" AA's reckless policy. Don't sit back and hope others complain. Do it yourself NOW.

• Anonymous- May 23, 2008

  Remove ALL overhead bins. If your carry-on doesn't fit beneath the seat, it is checked. Would speed both boarding and exiting the plane.

• TXTravlr - May 23, 2008

  Yes, Spirit does charge for luggage, but they also have very deeply discounted airfare. Unfortunately, I'd have to drive 6 and a half hours to get to an airport they service; otherwise, I'd gladly fly Spirit, fees and all. And Geez--if airlines start charging people for checking their wheelchairs, that's just about the lowest they can get without sinking BELOW the dirt. That ought to be in violation of some sort of ADA rule! I've always been strictly an American Airlines person, but my respect had been fading quickly. I did once use UPS to ship some gifts to my hotel because I just didn't want to try to carry them on with me. Worked like a charm--I just had to try to time it right for my arrival. I called the hotel first, they said just make sure I put to attention: customer name/date of of arrival on it with the hotels name and address. Worked like a charm--I think it was $12 to ship, and a $10 tip for the hotel guy. I sold my airline stock a long time ago; looks like I might need to reinvest it in FedEx and UPS.

• Pay N. More - May 23, 2008

  I predict that if more people don't start voting with their pocketbook and chosing to utilize other, more friendly airlines that AA will retrofit pay lavatories in their planes. You could even carry this a'la carte concept to a pay-as-you-go toilet paper dispenser. Bottom line on this is that if the public tolerate this, then more's to come.

• jj185 - May 23, 2008

  Well folks, in case you didn't know, Southwest Airlines still allows 2, YES" 2" , pieces of luggage to check in FREE of charge as long as they are 50 lbs or under per piece. PLUS you can still have a carry-on luggage and a personal item. They will always be my airline of choice even if I have to drive extra time to get to the airport!

• bubbleskimples - May 23, 2008

  Whatever happens with all other Airlines, American...you pioneer this atrocious slap against all of us suffering the economy enough thus far, so not only do we pay more for this cheated inflation to the airport, but now take it from the luggage charges...and you encourage airlines to follow...I seek that all cease and boycott you and your ways, and continue to do so with any and all other airlines that follow in such manner until this stops. Perhaps as Americans, we will stand against the whole thing. A revolutionary war in the economy is at hand, for the middle class will soon be no more!

• wheeling girl - May 23, 2008

  My favorite airlines was AA but, if they are going to be charging for baggage they do not need my business. This is a great way of losing customers.

• J.P.F. - Lifetime AA Platinum Member - May 23, 2008

  American Airlines has always been in the vanguard of the downward spiral of lousy air travel. This is only another example of their warped craftmanship. It is truly a giant among all the other competing horrid airlines abounding today! AA won't receive 15 cents from me, much less $15 going forward! - I've yet to hear of any significantly big reductions in senior management compensation/bonuses at AA. They're disgusting!

• 7aloha7 - May 24, 2008

  Since you cannot travel without clothes, American Airlines has found a way to extort money from their customers and I do mean EXTORT. I find this move on the part of American Airlines to be a genuine slap in the face to their customers. Carrying a suitcase on your flight is not the same as ordering extras when purchasing a car. Bringing necessities with you is not a luxury. How dare they do this!!!! Well, Delta Airlines, get ready for more customers. Delta has said it will not follow suit.

• V.H. - May 24, 2008

  If I had not already purchased my tickets for my upcoming summer vacation, I would not be choosing American Airlines! They are only extending the over-long wait for check-ins and overcrowding the already over-crowded cabins. Thanks for nothing American.

• Anonymous - May 27, 2008

  This is just ourtrageous. They might as well start charging for using those toilets too on board! I will do my very best to avoid AA while I have options. I will pay a few dollars more to another airline just to avoid AA, out of principle! HOpe the rest of them have better sense to not follow AA.

• lovestotravel - May 27, 2008

  Well, I've already purchased an international flight from AA for this July. Though I am exempt from these new charges on an international flight, I am still disgusted by them. As if their customer service wasn't bad enough (the reason I'm flying AA this summer is because they had to give me a $200 voucher for the last experience), now we are going to be at the mercy of hoping that they can do efficient boarding too. I do feel for the flight attendants, as it certainly wasn't their decision, and I think that those of us who have to endure this new procedure should make sure that we don't take it out on them. Rather save your comments for AA directly. That being said, perhaps they will re-evaluate the boarding and deplaning processes. If nothing else, boarding should begin sooner than it does now to make sure that flights are on time. I certainly wouldn't want to miss a connection flight over this. In the future...I doubt I will look to AA for my flights. I've been very pleased with Southwest, and it seems that they are adding more destinations all the time.

• family traveler - May 27, 2008

  I don't agree with the increase but I did do my research when I heard about the increase. They are not charging the extra cost of check bags if you brought your tickets earlier. I believe the cut off date was some time in May. They are also not charging for the extras that families need regardless of date (carriages, carseat, wheelchairs). Although they seem cruel they are not that cruel. I do agree that the fees should have been a fuel surcharge while the price of oil is at these all-time highs.

• GEORGE - May 27, 2008

  I am not going to pay $15 extra per bag x 2. I guess we will fly another airline. We did fly AA 11/07 We do have AA miles To somebody who said DRIVE...sure we will...2 or 3 days there and SAY HELLO and GOODBYE in the same hour and drive back + that hotel room or two costs WAY MORE THAN $15

• DHVegas - May 27, 2008

  Have already purchased my tickets on Amer., so will not affect me this time. However, I will never again fly Amer. As with so many large companies, they are again gougeing the public, while their CEO's enjoy high 6 fig. salaries. What a sad testimony to GREED!!

• alohathomas - May 27, 2008

  Out here in Hawaii, where legitimate travel is only by means of air, we have already lost two carriers, Aloha Airlines & ATA to this "business-minded" nonsense. If you want to be fair, charge passengers by the pound. And this includes weighing the passenger. A formula of weight per mile traveled per fuel cost would be easier to digest and deal with as other bloggers have already illuminated well the confusion the fare add-ons bring to the flying public. Don't fly American is another route to go. Let's see then how long American remains the #1 carrier!

• duped - May 28, 2008

  Just got back from a trip over Memorial Day weekend. I bought 2 one way tickets on separate airlines a couple weeks ago because it was cheaper. On the return flight I was told my first bag was free and the 2nd was $25.00. I checked my golf clubs because obviously I couldn't carry those on and I carried on my bag with clothes, etc. I was stopped at security for my "liquids" and I lost my toothpaste. Was sure cheaper than paying the extra $25 though. I too think it is dishonest to have add on fees like this. I understand why airlines do it though because they can fool enough people into buying tickets that the passengers have no other choice but to pay the fees later. It makes them more money. I guess my only option as a consumer is to be more diligent about knowing all the details of the airfare I am purchasing and the airline I will be flying. Sure makes it a lot harder to compare one airfare to another now though.

• blazer - May 28, 2008

  It seems to me that someone could make a discrimination case against AA or any airline that seeks to charge a baggage fee for certain groups of people and not others...first class/elite. I'm sick and tired of these 6-figure management people complaining how hard it is for their company to make money. These same people have no problem accepting those big bonuses and salaries...neither do they have to deal w/ the passengers like the flight attendants trying to get everyone's carry-on jammed into the small spaces. The flight attendants and reservationists will be handling the brunt of this mess and take all the nasty comments from complaining passengers. Maybe the CEO of AA should try coming down out of his high-class living and actually meet and deal with the public they so easily screw.

• jogil - May 29, 2008

  I fly domestically once or twice a year but internationally at least four times a year. For twenty years, I've take only a carry on after several sad experiences with checked luggage, the last time with AA. The carry on works for me for either a week or six weeks. I try to use either SW Air or foreign carriers where I feel treated with some respect. Large American carriers are for the birds and have been for some years. I really hate to think of all the people over packing a so-called carry on and jamming it into an overhead - if AA needs the loot, just up the price rather than use this convoluted way to profitability. Can't blame travelers for being upset. However, I can understand AA discouraging the second checked piece - one doesn't really beed to bring the kitchen sink along for a weekend in Florida!

• rhonda - May 29, 2008

  Seems they should just weigh every person with their baggage and if you weigh more than amt, you hav eto pay $1/ pound more. Gas prices are skyrocketing and I understand them wanting to save money, but really they everyone should be allowed to bring on a certain amt. of weight period.

• Nickels being nickeled and dimed. - May 29, 2008

  I, too, have already purchased a ticket for travel in June with AA. I won't be buying another. Especially considering that of the last three consecutive flights I've taken with AA - my luggage was lost on one trip (do we get a refund if we don't get our luggage at our final destination?), and both of the other two trips were delayed long enough that I had to rent cars and drive home in order to get to my appointments in a timely manner. AA can't deliver their product, but let them charge away anyhow. And yes, I could buy my liquids at my final destination, but VERY FEW hair products are sold "everywhere", or in sizes that wouldn't result in waste. I didn't think charging a little for the second bag was a big deal, but charging for any bags - that's robbery. Agreed, the rich get richer while the working class and poor get screwed again!!! My cousin was a flight attendant on AA flight 11, and died on 9/11 when the first plane struck the World Trade Center. This is not the company he was proud to work for!!!!

• KARNELLA - May 29, 2008

  No wonder people are shipping their bags ahead with UPS or FedEx ground, Lets all ship our bags. I also hope someone is going to look into the law suit. A class action suit should work.

• Family Vacationer - May 29, 2008

  I suspect that the only customers that AA will have will be business customers. People that claim vacationers "bring the kitchen sink" must not travel with kids. I have to bring car seats for my 6-year old twins or rent them from the car rental at $10.00 each per day. (that's two bags right there). I will be looking into pre-shipping my luggage to my destination. How much could it be, $25 per bag???

• Palo905 - June 3, 2008

  To Valtuff adn Achevres and all you others that think those of us larger should pay extra for our weight. SURPRISE - we already do, how many o fus 300 lbs people are forced to buy 2 tickets not one but 2 to fly t the same destination. While I understand that if you cannot fit in the seat a second should be purchased. I have been forced manytimes to buy a second seat when I can fit comfortable in one seat and not encrouch in someone elses space. What infuriates me is when I am forced to buy a second seat and then the airlines is oversold and TAKES my second seat. Never reimbursing me for my additional cost. Those of us larger already pay many times over for the same flight you take.

• New idea plus - June 3, 2008

  Re carry-on luggage. Require passengers to ONLY be able to put their ONE piece in bin over THEIR SEAT NOT OVER ANYONE ELSES. We preferred American until now. Won't fly them if we have to pay for luggage.

• DenverFlyer - June 3, 2008

  American says they need to do this to recoup gas prices, but have you watched their fares lately? They have skyrocketed! So we pay more for the fare and more to check even one bag! How about the excecutives get real about their outrageous salaries? When large amounts of cash is skimmed off the top whether the airline is profitable or not it's no wonder they are in trouble.

• JAB2165 - June 7, 2008

  The airlines should pay customers for all of the damn aggravation they cause.

• rosietheriviter - June 12, 2008

  What do you mean --cheap fares? I just coughed up $711 for RT Boston! Some of us don't travel on expense account or frequently enough to get the added perks like a comfortable -not- middle seat! Now I have to take out a loan just to have clothes? Sounds like sending it to myself may be the answer.

• Fabbenn - June 19, 2008

  I say we allow the off shore drilling so that we can get more jet fuel, don't have to depend on foreign countries and then maybe the fuel prices will go down. Then maybe the airlines will be in a better position to not have to raise their fares and start charging for everything that should be included. Where will it stop? Who knows?I would rather have the fee included in my fare because they never enforce the 1 small bag and carryon (like a purse or brief case) and people are going to be pushing the issue and stuffing the overhead bins.

• me - June 21, 2008

  I can't believe no-one has brought up the obvious answer to these woes, which are obviously triggered by high gas prices (and not its not driving - that'll cost you even more than flying, trust me): Trains. I predict that as more and more people get pissed off, they'll start asking the obvious question: why don't we have high speed quality train service like many other countries do? And then perhaps rail will get some of the $ and investment it needs to compete

• mariaelena - March 27, 2009

  We have a trip planned in July via US Airways. They're charging $25. for each checked bag X 2 - going and coming back. Outrageous. We will be gone for 11 days so that's $100.00 for 4 pieces of checked luggage.The price of the airfare was not cheap either. Next time I'll book my flight separately from the resort.