Skip navigation

Cheap Airfare, Vacation Deals, Car Rental, and Discount Travel - SmarterTravel.com
User's Avatar
My SmarterTravel

The Truth About Deceptive Airline Practices

The Extra Mile
images/photos/columnists/timwinship.gif
Airline safety check (Photo: Stewart Cohen/Index Open)
Editor's Note: This story was originally published on September 4, 2007. To see the most recent SmarterTravel articles on related topics, please click on any of the following links: airfare, frequent flyer, The Extra Mile, Tim Winship.

Numbers can tell the whole story. Or they can be used to obscure it.

While it's hardly the only business to do so, the airline industry has shown a particular tendency to torture data until it reveals a story of its own liking. Its fuzzy math gives the traveling public an inaccurate impression of loyalty program popularity, on-time records, and low prices, to name a few topics close to flyers' hearts. Flyers are now finding it quite difficult to choose which carrier to support when all they ever hear are half-truths.

Who's really a member?

As an example of the airlines' creative accounting, consider a recent news release from American, the world's largest airline. In the release, American boasted that its mileage program, AAdvantage, was the world's first and remains the largest with 56 million members.

Advertisement
There's no question that AAdvantage legitimately holds the title as the first of the modern travel-rewards programs. It beat out archrival United by a mere two weeks in the race to launch a loyalty scheme in the early days of airline deregulation.

But most industry outsiders would be scandalized to discover that in reporting the membership of its program, American includes every account ever established since the program's inception. Included among those 56 million members are duplicate accounts; accounts of people who signed up but never earned or redeemed a mile; and accounts of those who enrolled at some point during the program's 26-year history but have since died.

American, it should be pointed out, is not alone in its member accounting practices. This tactic has become the industry standard.

If such metrics were purely academic, the airlines might be forgiven for indulging in arcane counting methods. But airlines tout these figures in their marketing efforts to establish the legitimacy of their programs. They play to the natural assumption that more members means not only a bigger program but a better one.

What matters to consumers is a measure of other travelers' engagement with various programs. Meaningful disclosure by the airlines would consist of reporting the number of active members. What constitutes activity, and whether it occurred within six months, one year, or two can be debated. But including as members account holders who are inactive, some terminally, is useless at best and cynically misleading at worst.

Is your on-time flight stuck on the runway?

Another area where the airlines have played fast and loose with their reporting has been in the area of on-time performance.

According to the Department of Transportation, a flight has departed on time so long as the plane has pushed back from the departure gate within 15 minutes of the published departure time. That seems reasonable until you realize that the aircraft's leaving the terminal and its taking to the air are two very different and separate events.

In fact, in order to maintain high on-time departure percentages, airlines routinely back their loaded planes onto the tarmac knowing full well the flight won't be taking off any time soon. The disconnect between what the airlines report and what passengers actually experience was made glaringly apparent in a recent series of incidents in which fully loaded planes left the gate only to sit for several hours on the tarmac a mere stone's throw from the terminal. Whereas passengers on these flights surely considered themselves delayed, if not kidnapped, the offending airlines could report on-time departures.

Delays are clearly underreported, but the airlines continue using the data to promote their supposed reliability. What travelers want is a measure of an airline's ability to reliably transport passengers between two points, departing and arriving as promised by the airline's schedule. To many consumers, that amounts simply to an airline's on-time arrival performance, and that's exactly what the airlines can and should provide.

How cheap is that cheap ticket?

Perhaps the most flagrant example of the airline's numbering problems is in the area of pricing. Take as an example the following from United: "Travel from where you are to where you want to go this fall for as low as $44."

While the ad trumpets a $44 fare, the fine print acknowledges that price is one-way based on a required round-trip. The real price is $88—assuming, that is, there are seats available at the teaser price.

 
ALERT!
Your pop-up blocker security
setting is too high.



To view this page and still use your pop-up blocker, please make the following adjustment to Internet Explorer.

- Click on "Tools"
- Click on "Pop-up Blocker"
- Click on "Always Allow Pop-ups from This Site..."
- Try the link again

If you are not using Internet Explorer or are still having issues, please email feedback@smartertravel.com with details

Hotels

COMPARE PRICES
Air Departure Date Calendar
Air Return Date Calendar
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Get the early word on the latest travel deals of the day picked by our editors. Sign up for our free Deal Alert newsletter.

email address:

DESTINATIONS